Archive for the ‘website’ Category

Forms and Usability

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Forms are something that should be on every campaign website no matter how big or small the campaign is. These forms might be to collect contact information, request volunteers, or sign up for events. In any case, the first question always asked when drafting a form is “What information do we need to collect?”

The first reaction to that question is always something like “We need x, and y, and z would be nice…oh, and we can’t forget etc, etc” From a campaign stand point, the more information is the better. The more information you have the better you can mine the data for information about your supporters and the more ways you will have to contact your constituents. Before you go creating a hundred form fields…stop. Think about the form from a user perspective. As a user, do you want to answer a hundred questions? Do you want to have to go through pages and pages of text boxes without knowing when it ends? Most likely the answer is going to be “No.” Your die hard fans may spend the time, but they are going to turn up to vote for you on election day no matter what. The simpler your form is, the more likely visitors will actually fill out the form.

A second issue is with trust. In other words, what information does the visitor trust giving over to your website. There are multiple concerns here such as who sees the data? Where is the data stored? How is the data used? And, is the data secure? You will never be able to answer these questions in a way that will satisfy your visitors. The best solution is to only ask for information that people do not mind having floating around in a server.

One thing I notice a lot of forms do not have is form validation. This is to validate the information itself. For example, an email should have an “@” symbol followed by some sort of domain such as “gmail.com”. If you caught a possible typo in the email, how are you going to get it corrected…by emailing them? Also, you should give them an error message telling them specifically what field is broken. If they put letters in the phone field, say “Invalid characters for phone. Please only enter numbers.” It will also deter bots and people who want to fill your form out with junk. It is worth while to collect only the good data.

Finally, consider layout. I could go on and on about layout, but all I am going to say make it easy to navigate and fill out. Your form should be all on one page and form fields should be obvious. Layout also includes the means of navigating to the form. It should be very obvious how to get to the form and what it is. For example, if I want to volunteer, I do not want to spend a bunch of time searching for that form.

Everyone does forms slightly different. The important thing is to make it usable. There is a balance between simplicity and getting the information you want. You don’t want to ask a million questions, but one question is probably not helpful. A good example of a simple and usable form is Kasich’s Sign Up form. It is short and easy to understand. Better yet, he has a short little video at the top that you can play. Bonus: videos are more engaging and easier to watch than reading a bunch of text.

The next post will be July 5th.

Why 404 Errors Matter

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

We have all seen the “Page Not Found” error while surfing the web. This is commonly called a “404 Error.” All websites, political or not, face this issue. Lost pages come from many sources. They may be old links or the user has a typo in their url address. Either way, it is your responsibility to help the user find the content they are actually looking for. It can be a challenge to figure out where to send the user after the error.

There are several different ways websites handle this problem. Senate hopeful Rand Paul from Kentucky has his error page be the home page. If you go to http://www.randpaul2010.com/not-a-real-page you will not be able to tell that it was an error. The only sign of an error is in the title of the page. If you are using a browser that supports tab browsing, you will see the tab entitled “Nothing found for Not-a-real-page.” While it is unlikely that anyone would be intending to find Rand Paul’s page on “not-a-real-page,” the point is the error could be much more helpful. An average user would think the error was the website’s fault since there was no alert that the intended content is missing.

A second solution is to tell the user that the page was not found with a custom 404 error page. Another Senate hopeful just north of Paul’s state, is Rob Portman of Ohio. If you go to http://www.robportman.com/not-a-real-page you will see that his site explicitly states there was an error. This is helpful because, 1) it helps the user figure out the problem and 2) it’s honest. It even has a link to go back to the home page. I would suggest Portman go a bit farther and have a “Are you looking for…” section with a handful of popular links like “Donate” and “Volunteer.” At the very least you want to give the user enough information to find the solution. As in all web design, the less work you place on the user means the more likely they are to stay and engage your content.

The worst is to do nothing. Take a look at New York’s Republican party’s error at http://www.nygop.org/not-a-real-page. Most visitors would try the url once or twice more and then give up entirely. By doing nothing, you will annoy visitors interested in your campaign and may also lose a volunteer or even a donor.

No one ever wants to plan for having a broken website. That’s not what you pay your webmaster to make. However, users will find ways to make it to non-existent pages. It will happen and the best approach is to capture those lost users. They will appreciate it and in return will engage your content and if you are luck, they will donate.

The next post will be on June 22nd.

The “Anti-Candidate” Site

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

It is common for political candidates to have a website that advertises the positive aspects of their own candidacy.  However, in some cases a site is created to communicating the negative aspects of a politician.  This is what I mean when I refer to an “anti-candidate” site.

The two that I have had the most interaction with recently revolve around the Ohio gubernatorial race.  The Ohio primary was earlier last week, but both the incumbent Democrat, Gov. Ted Strickland, and the Republican, John Kasich, were unopposed.  Now that the primary has passed, the campaign has begun to heat up.  There is an anti-candidate site for both candidates.  Http://www.TurnAroundTed.com is the anti-Strickland site while http://www.KasichFacts.com is the anti-Kasich.  The disclaimers for both sites claim the respective parties as the owners of the sites, not a specific candidate.  In any case, the approaches taken are different.

To start, I believe TurnAroundTed.com is a better site.  This is more than a political bias.  TurnAroundTed.com clearly has had more work put into it.  This site is rich in content that is updated relatively often.  There are links to articles and statements both independent and created by TurnAroundTed.com.  Just recently they added an interactive map of Ohio where visitors can click on their county to see how their county’s economy has changed since Gov. Strickland first announced he was going to run five years ago.  Please check it out at http://www.turnaroundted.com/map.  All the data there is clearly cited with links.  Even more importantly, there is a place to sign up to volunteer.  Once visitors are convinced that their governor needs to be changed, they can take action.  TurnAroundTed.com is rich in content, personable, and interactive.

KasichFacts.com has none of TurnAroundTed.com’s advantages.  There is very little content and the design looks thrown together.  They have not even bothered to create a favicon (thats the little icon that typically shows up with the site name in the bookmark list.  This blogs is a red “R”).  The one similar feature is that on one page called “Cuts” you can type in your zip code and see how much funding Kasich supposedly wants to cut from services such as schools and fire departments.  The citation is simply “Legislative Service Commission” and a few dates.  There is not even a link for these citations (this is a common theme throughout the site).

What KasichFacts.com has going for it is advertising.  I see Twitter posts that reference KasichFacts.com far more often than TurnAroundTed.com.  Many of these quotes originate from the sites themselves with a “Share This” button which tend to be more common on KasichFacts.com.  Secondly, I see paid ads on Google for KasichFacts.com quite frequently.  This ad recently showed up on my GMail page:

Google, like Bing, Yahoo!, etc, tries to match ads to the context.  The text and keywords set by the ad’s owners is the basis for Google.  The reason I see ads like this is because I have been getting a lot of mail from the Kasich campaign.  This leads me to believe that KasichFacts.com is purposefully targeting Kasich supporters.  A quick Google search for the term “Kasich” yields similar results.  The number two result in my list is KasichFacts.com.  However, their trick is to title their page as “News Alert: John Kasich” which to the casual user will seem like a legitimate neutral site about Kasich.  On a related note, the only ad I see on the left site (where Google typically puts standard ads) is an ad for Strickland’s main site.  A search for “Strickland” will give you pro-Strickland results and of course KasichFacts.com.  In other words, search Kasich and you will get anti-Kasich and pro-Strickland sites.  Search Strickland and you get similar results, anti-Kasich and pro-Strickland sites.

At the end of the day, even though TurnAroundTed.com is a better, more informed site, KasichFacts.com will win because its marketing efforts are currently out maneuvering not only TurnAroundTed.com but Kasich’s campaign in general.  Both sites have strengths and weaknesses, however the strengths are not mutually exclusive.  I hope TurnAroundTed.com can get its marketing efforts ramped up to compete with KasichFacts.com.

The next post will be on May 25th

The Value of a Responsive Web Team

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

So your website’s content is dynamic right? If not then you are probably new to this blog. Now, the question is how dynamic is your content? While I am not suggesting that you have someone sitting in front of a computer constantly finding something to update every second, there are times when a quick and radical change is required. As you are probably aware of, in the world of politics things can happen very quickly. However, you must also realize that technology can enable you to act just as quick.

For example, just last week the Democrats finally pushed their version of health care reform through the House. In few days Republicans had to act, the GOP website was literally transformed. Visitors to www.GOP.com were redirected to a special page that just asked for donations to “Fire Pelosi” (at the time of writing this was still true). The concept was to raise money for Republicans to take at least 40 seats in the coming election to force Pelosi out of the Speaker position. This was a temporary campaign with the goal of raising about $400,000 in 40 hours. At the end of the 40 hours, the GOP raised well over $1 million and continued to raise money (currently at $1,551,811). Because the timing was right and the web developers were able to act quickly enough, the campaign was a big success and we may very well hear the theme of “Fire Pelosi” throughout this election cycle.

It is important to note that this tactic should be considered for both taking advantage of opportunities and to stem a coming crisis. Technology is fast and dynamic. It is important to remember to leverage that responsiveness.

The next post will be April 12th.

Technology Resolutions for the New Year

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Keeping with tradition, I would like to set a few resolutions for Republicans in terms of technology. With 2010 being an important election year, these goals become even more critical. Below I have 3 simple resolutions which I hope your campaign will adopt.

1. Master at least one social media platform
I have talked about many different social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, etc.). Many campaigns have adopted social media, but I feel that a good number of those campaigns need to develop their strategy more. There are often two mistakes campaigns make: one inexcusable, the other slightly more understandable, but should still be remedied. First, the inexcusable mistake. Many feel that “if you build it, they will come.” Social media does not work this way. You must engage and build a community. The second mistake is having someone on your staff post content. It is understandable that candidates are extremely busy people and sometimes they will not be able to directly engage everyone who responds to them. However, the most ideal situation is to have the candidate engage social media. Voters will appreciate it more and take more interest in the campaign if they know they are interacting with the candidate (after all, that is the point of social media). Both of these mistakes can be prevented by mastering at least one social media. Know how to use it, follow the changes in that platform, and engage users and build followers.

2. Keep website content fresh
This is a challenge for any organization with a website. Adding content can be time consuming and tedious. However, visitors to your website expect to see up-to-date information. I have even seen sites that advertise the candidate running for the wrong position when they used their old campaign site for a run at a new office. This will only frustrate and annoy voters. On the other hand, voters will revisit your site if they know new information will be there. The site becomes a resource and will get bookmarked. Big campaigns especially need to keep their sites fresh, but it is important for even local candidates. A great example of a local candidate with lots of fresh content is Ohio State Rep. Ron Amstutz, http://www.amstutz.org

3. Develop a comprehensive online strategy
Too many campaigns do not have a comprehensive strategy for the Internet. In my experience, campaigns approach new media in bits and pieces without looking at the big picture. They also do not sit down with their staff and draw up a plan. Technology still is treated like an afterthought. I strongly recommend developing a plan, and then revisiting the plan every now and then. Analyze your options, discuss pros and cons, and decide the best way to execute the plan.

I hope you take these three resolutions into consideration, and above all else…have a happy New Year!

The next post will be January 19th.

The Wayne County Young Republican Website

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

One of the many organizations I am part of is the Wayne County Young Republicans. WCYR was formed early in 2009 in response to the high level of Democratic youth votes in the county. My role is the Marketing Chairman which means my challenge is to find young Republicans in the county and get them to join a new organization. My first task was to put together a website and online strategy for the organization. We recently completed the first phase of the website at http://www.WayneCountyYRs.com and I wanted to share a few key elements of the website.

First, take a look at the home page. We have a large image that shows something the organization has done. Right off the bat, the organization looks active. Then, we have two columns on the top right: Events and the Twitter Feed. Visitors can keep up to date on what the organization is doing and are invited to follow the organization’s events and Twitter feed. To further reinforce the concept of staying connected, just below that area is a form to sign up for the email newsletter and a cluster of links to all the WCYR’s social media.

On the topic of social media, we can now look at the organizations strategy for social media. We have included a number of social media elements including YouTube, Flickr, Facebook, blogging, and Twitter. These are all possible points of contact with the community which mean possible points of recruitment. They also each serve a different function. Facebook events have been a great way for WCYR to organize and advertise events. Flickr will be the main repository for pictures of events. This will help show how active and involved members are in events. The blog helps focus on the ideals of the organization. I could go into much more detail on each element but the point is we are providing multiple ways for members to find us and interact with the organization.

Another important part of the site is the Committees link. This page has a list of all the current executive committee members and information about each. The idea was to try to break down the “stranger” factor with joining a new organization. If there was a young Republican who wanted to join, they could become familiar with some of the officers. Not only would they know what they look like from the pictures, but also certain information about the person. This makes the officers more relatable and approachable. Just think about how much easier it will be at the first meeting you attend to start up a conversation with Doug Deeken when you know he is the guy who is not only an engineer, but also is a stay at home dad in Doylestown who often calls into the Matt Patrick show to talk about issues Doug brings up on his YouTube channel.

There will be more to this site in the future. More connections to local campaigns, more information on events, both past and up-coming, and new features. The site is to the point where we can advertise it heavily and it provides a good resource to members. Hopefully, some of the ideas and tactics that went into building this site can be easily transferred to other political organizations.

The next post will be Nov. 24th

Republicans and New Media

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

About a month ago the Ohio Erie County GOP Chairman Mathew Old asked be to put together a document with my ideas on how Republicans can leverage new media. My hope is that this document can help campaigns begin to think about new media and ask important questions. Below is the link to the document and the summary.

Republicans and New Media (pdf)

Many will argue that “traditional” media has evolved over time. In many ways, it has. From the written word, to the radio, to the television it seems the dynamic of media is on a continuous and steady march. However, in the past few years there has been a fundamental revolution in media. It is the advent of the Internet. Traditional media is all one way communication; the advertiser has all the power, controlling the information while the public is at the mercy of billboards and commercials. The majority of the public does not have the resources to broadcast their thoughts and opinions to millions of people. With the arrival of the Internet, individuals have just as much power as the advertiser. They can write a post on a blog that will reach just as many people, if not more, than a TV ad. They can tweet and Facebook their friends about their positive or negative opinions. Many organizations fail to understand the multidirectional nature of communication on the Internet. They are stuck in the traditional media mentality and end up annoying customers with spam and failing to address complaints that are instantly shared with millions of fellow users.

Corporations are just now realizing that the Internet has given their consumers more power than their own PR departments. For the most part, political campaigns are even farther behind. The 2008 election gave rise to one political organization that clearly understands and respects the complex and powerful nature of the Internet: the Obama team. Obama’s new media campaign demonstrated that these technologies are relevant but no single organization can control the discussion. To be successful, a candidate must participate in the discussion, not lead it. They must use the opportunity to listen, not shout. They must sincerely engage voters, not spam them. A candidate must genuinely understand the paradigm shift, rather than simply jumping on the band wagon without understanding where the band wagon is going.

Republicans and New Media (pdf)

The next post will be Oct 13th.

Conversations from the Wayne County Fair

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

This past weekend I returned home to attend the Wayne County Fair. I spent a significant amount of the time at the Republican’s booth discussing politics and technology. While I could write a post on each of my conversations I am going to give a broad overview of some of the things I discussed that I think are relevant to share in this blog.

The first candidate I ran into was Craig Sanders who is running for Wooster City Council At-Large. His concern was that his website,http://www.craigsanders.net/ , still advertised he was running for Ward 1, which he did in the past. The problem was his campaign had no way of directly changing content. They had to call up their provider and ask that they change it, who were not very responsive. I checked today and it looks like they managed to change what is advertised on the site. However, the title tag still says “Ward 1.” While no organization should tolerate this kind of dysfunction, the demands of a political campaign require responsiveness. This is why campaigns need to be very careful about how they set up their site. If Sanders was using a content management system (CMS) he could change it himself without worrying about time delays and contacting a programmer. All the intricacies like the title tag would be fixed instantly and automatically.

The next candidate I talked to was Ron Amstutz. He is currently the chair of the budget committee in the Ohio State House of Representatives and is from Wayne County. Amstutz seems to always be experimenting with technology. Here is what he tried and had lots of success. First, Amstutz created a short survey about state issues designed to be released around the time of the fair. Then he got on Facebook and created a list of all of his constituents. Finally, he invited all of his Facebook friends on that list to take his survey online. He also had paper version at the Republican booth at the fair. Just in the first few days he got a ton of feed back and there are still three more days left for the fair.

Now that you know what Amstutz did, let me walk you through why it was awesome. First, Amstutz reached out to his constituents through an online survey. He is able to ask his roughly 110,000 constituents to directly participate with him on state wide issues. Voters will take note of that kind of interaction and will feel more valued by the candidate. Furthermore, Amstutz leveraged social media by reaching out to his Facebook friends. He didn’t just send them a message, he invited them to a week long event (the fair survey). He also did not send it to everyone. He targeted his own constituency using Facebook’s list feature. With a different project he may want to target a different group, such as his Facebook friends in Columbus. This use of the list allows him to only get the group he wants and cuts down on spam. Too much spam and messages about things that do not apply to the individual will always result in “defriending.”

Finally, I had a short conversation about Internet tools with Jim Renacci’s campaign manager Matt Hutson. Jim Renacci is running for the Ohio 16th District for US House of Representatives. This is the same district that State Senator Kirk Schuring ran in last year. His website is http://www.renacciforcongress.com/.Even though I had a short discussion with Matt, I feel pretty confident that this campaign understands that they have to use all these new and exciting online tools. First, he recognized the importance of having YouTube videos show up under certain search terms. In this case, they managed to have a positive video of Renacci as the top result when you search “Boccieri” (Boccieri is his Democrat rival). He was also very interested in integrating social media into their new website. Right now Renacci’s Facebook and Twitter accounts have a long way to grow, but the campaign is putting effort forth 14 months before the election. Finally, Matt recognized the value of bloggers. He pointed out a positive post that was written just the other day and is excited about connecting Renacci (not a campaign staff member) directly with other bloggers.

There are a lot more to discuss on each of these candidates. The basic point however, is that there is a lot going on in the world of political technology. Candidates are realizing there are problems and opportunities associated with the Internet. This is a topic of discussion that we must always engage.

The next post will be September 29th.

Why Spend on Graphic Design

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

Today I have a new logo for Republitech. Rather than having something that I threw together I decided to use a real graphic designer. Like a lot of people, I do not have a graphic design talent. However, I do know the elements that make a good design. I thought today, in honor of my new logo, I would discuss why investing in a good graphic designer is a good idea.

First, it is only a good idea to have a designer that knows what looks good, but one that knows what works well for websites. As I have stated many many times, the Internet is interactive. Your website should be designed with interactiveness in mind. That is, understanding where a user’s eyes are drawn, what users imply certain colors mean on the web, how to visually navigate your menu system, how to segment content, etc. I could write long posts on each of the issues mentioned in the previous sentence, but the point I am trying to make is that there is more to design than just what looks pretty. I have seen several good graphic designers struggle with designing for the web. The problem is there are designers out there who were trained and practiced in graphic design before the Internet really took hold. They do awesome print material, but struggle with the interactive nature of the web. Having something that works well on the web also requires a certian organic process. If you have a tracking system set up (I highly recommend Google Analytics) then you can test many minor changes. For example, you can answer questions like “How many more people click on my donate button if I change it’s location on the home page?” and “What is the optimal font size for my menu?” My suggestion is to find a designer who has had a lot of online experience and can work with you over the course of the campaign to continue to improve and optimize the user experience. I highly recommend Greg Peterson of L’Atelier Muetpointe located in my home town of Wooster, Ohio.

Secondly, in politics it is always a good idea to develop a “brand.” Companies do it all the time with colors and images. Developing a clean look that conveys your message is critical. Let us take a look at Obama’s logo.

Obama Logo

The colors used are red, white, and blue. These are common colors used in American politics and blue and white are Obama’s colors. The logo is also rounded yet sharp. This conveys a sense of modernity, or as many others saw it a change from the old way of politics to the new. The logo itself looks like a sun raising over farmland, like a new day over the heartland of America. This implies “change” and gives a sense of “hope” for a symbol of America: farming. I would say Obama’s logo is the most brilliant piece of graphic design work I have ever seen. I could go on and one about how brilliant the rest of his graphic design work (from websites to posters) but I think you get the point.

The biggest challenge for a campaign and graphic design is expense. I am not going to lie, good graphic design is not cheap. Expect to pay hundreds of dollars at minimum just for a good logo. This is a decision that has to be made by you. However, I strongly advise campaigns to seriously consider the benefits. For a small campaign with a well known local candidate graphic design will not be on top of their list. However, good graphic design may make the difference in a tight House race. I am by no means suggesting that simply because your site looks awesome people will vote for you. What I am saying is that good graphic design will help consistences relate to you, understand who you are, and feel at ease using the resources you provide them with online. Those are legitimate reasons that will make you better at your job.

Using an RSS Feed to Stay Ahead

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

A common question I get is “What exactly is an RSS feed?” In technical terms it is a simple xml formatted file which is commonly used to update data. To add to the confusion RSS is sometimes interpreted as meaning “Really Simple Syndication” but also can be interpreted as meaning “Rich Site Summary.” In either case, it is the same thing: raw xml data coming from a website. So with all this technico mumbo jumbo why should you actually care about RSS feeds?

An RSS feed can be used to deliver real time updates for events, news, and blogs. It is essentially a stream of data directly from the data source (e.g. your website). This is very critical for political campaigns. RSS feeds can handle delivering all the event updates and press releases straight to the voter (assuming the voter has subscribed). It is a great way to keep people informed about what your campaign is doing.

Subscribing to an RSS feed is quite easy. The user can subscribe to particular feeds using a variety of feed readers. I recommend Google Reader. Subscribing is as simple as copying and pasting a link into your reader. The user will then be sent updates when you enter them into the feed.

The sharing of these data streams not only informs readers but they can also appear on websites. I highly recommend having the feed displayed on your own website. A common trick I do is turn my Google Calendar into an RSS feed so the information about events is easily given to the voters in multiple formats. RSS feeds can even be integrated into other’s websites. For example, you may include the state party’s RSS feed or they may include yours on their website. The great thing about RSS feeds is that they give you flexibility.

RSS feeds keeps everyone informed. They is easy to participate. And they gets the information seen in multiple places in multiple formats. Political campaigns need to be providing up to date information on events, positions, etc. and RSS feeds are an excellent way for a campaign to keep a competitive edge.

The next post will be on September 1st.