Archive for the ‘usability’ Category

Forms and Usability

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Forms are something that should be on every campaign website no matter how big or small the campaign is. These forms might be to collect contact information, request volunteers, or sign up for events. In any case, the first question always asked when drafting a form is “What information do we need to collect?”

The first reaction to that question is always something like “We need x, and y, and z would be nice…oh, and we can’t forget etc, etc” From a campaign stand point, the more information is the better. The more information you have the better you can mine the data for information about your supporters and the more ways you will have to contact your constituents. Before you go creating a hundred form fields…stop. Think about the form from a user perspective. As a user, do you want to answer a hundred questions? Do you want to have to go through pages and pages of text boxes without knowing when it ends? Most likely the answer is going to be “No.” Your die hard fans may spend the time, but they are going to turn up to vote for you on election day no matter what. The simpler your form is, the more likely visitors will actually fill out the form.

A second issue is with trust. In other words, what information does the visitor trust giving over to your website. There are multiple concerns here such as who sees the data? Where is the data stored? How is the data used? And, is the data secure? You will never be able to answer these questions in a way that will satisfy your visitors. The best solution is to only ask for information that people do not mind having floating around in a server.

One thing I notice a lot of forms do not have is form validation. This is to validate the information itself. For example, an email should have an “@” symbol followed by some sort of domain such as “gmail.com”. If you caught a possible typo in the email, how are you going to get it corrected…by emailing them? Also, you should give them an error message telling them specifically what field is broken. If they put letters in the phone field, say “Invalid characters for phone. Please only enter numbers.” It will also deter bots and people who want to fill your form out with junk. It is worth while to collect only the good data.

Finally, consider layout. I could go on and on about layout, but all I am going to say make it easy to navigate and fill out. Your form should be all on one page and form fields should be obvious. Layout also includes the means of navigating to the form. It should be very obvious how to get to the form and what it is. For example, if I want to volunteer, I do not want to spend a bunch of time searching for that form.

Everyone does forms slightly different. The important thing is to make it usable. There is a balance between simplicity and getting the information you want. You don’t want to ask a million questions, but one question is probably not helpful. A good example of a simple and usable form is Kasich’s Sign Up form. It is short and easy to understand. Better yet, he has a short little video at the top that you can play. Bonus: videos are more engaging and easier to watch than reading a bunch of text.

The next post will be July 5th.

Why 404 Errors Matter

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

We have all seen the “Page Not Found” error while surfing the web. This is commonly called a “404 Error.” All websites, political or not, face this issue. Lost pages come from many sources. They may be old links or the user has a typo in their url address. Either way, it is your responsibility to help the user find the content they are actually looking for. It can be a challenge to figure out where to send the user after the error.

There are several different ways websites handle this problem. Senate hopeful Rand Paul from Kentucky has his error page be the home page. If you go to http://www.randpaul2010.com/not-a-real-page you will not be able to tell that it was an error. The only sign of an error is in the title of the page. If you are using a browser that supports tab browsing, you will see the tab entitled “Nothing found for Not-a-real-page.” While it is unlikely that anyone would be intending to find Rand Paul’s page on “not-a-real-page,” the point is the error could be much more helpful. An average user would think the error was the website’s fault since there was no alert that the intended content is missing.

A second solution is to tell the user that the page was not found with a custom 404 error page. Another Senate hopeful just north of Paul’s state, is Rob Portman of Ohio. If you go to http://www.robportman.com/not-a-real-page you will see that his site explicitly states there was an error. This is helpful because, 1) it helps the user figure out the problem and 2) it’s honest. It even has a link to go back to the home page. I would suggest Portman go a bit farther and have a “Are you looking for…” section with a handful of popular links like “Donate” and “Volunteer.” At the very least you want to give the user enough information to find the solution. As in all web design, the less work you place on the user means the more likely they are to stay and engage your content.

The worst is to do nothing. Take a look at New York’s Republican party’s error at http://www.nygop.org/not-a-real-page. Most visitors would try the url once or twice more and then give up entirely. By doing nothing, you will annoy visitors interested in your campaign and may also lose a volunteer or even a donor.

No one ever wants to plan for having a broken website. That’s not what you pay your webmaster to make. However, users will find ways to make it to non-existent pages. It will happen and the best approach is to capture those lost users. They will appreciate it and in return will engage your content and if you are luck, they will donate.

The next post will be on June 22nd.

Republicans and New Media

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

About a month ago the Ohio Erie County GOP Chairman Mathew Old asked be to put together a document with my ideas on how Republicans can leverage new media. My hope is that this document can help campaigns begin to think about new media and ask important questions. Below is the link to the document and the summary.

Republicans and New Media (pdf)

Many will argue that “traditional” media has evolved over time. In many ways, it has. From the written word, to the radio, to the television it seems the dynamic of media is on a continuous and steady march. However, in the past few years there has been a fundamental revolution in media. It is the advent of the Internet. Traditional media is all one way communication; the advertiser has all the power, controlling the information while the public is at the mercy of billboards and commercials. The majority of the public does not have the resources to broadcast their thoughts and opinions to millions of people. With the arrival of the Internet, individuals have just as much power as the advertiser. They can write a post on a blog that will reach just as many people, if not more, than a TV ad. They can tweet and Facebook their friends about their positive or negative opinions. Many organizations fail to understand the multidirectional nature of communication on the Internet. They are stuck in the traditional media mentality and end up annoying customers with spam and failing to address complaints that are instantly shared with millions of fellow users.

Corporations are just now realizing that the Internet has given their consumers more power than their own PR departments. For the most part, political campaigns are even farther behind. The 2008 election gave rise to one political organization that clearly understands and respects the complex and powerful nature of the Internet: the Obama team. Obama’s new media campaign demonstrated that these technologies are relevant but no single organization can control the discussion. To be successful, a candidate must participate in the discussion, not lead it. They must use the opportunity to listen, not shout. They must sincerely engage voters, not spam them. A candidate must genuinely understand the paradigm shift, rather than simply jumping on the band wagon without understanding where the band wagon is going.

Republicans and New Media (pdf)

The next post will be Oct 13th.

Why Spend on Graphic Design

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

Today I have a new logo for Republitech. Rather than having something that I threw together I decided to use a real graphic designer. Like a lot of people, I do not have a graphic design talent. However, I do know the elements that make a good design. I thought today, in honor of my new logo, I would discuss why investing in a good graphic designer is a good idea.

First, it is only a good idea to have a designer that knows what looks good, but one that knows what works well for websites. As I have stated many many times, the Internet is interactive. Your website should be designed with interactiveness in mind. That is, understanding where a user’s eyes are drawn, what users imply certain colors mean on the web, how to visually navigate your menu system, how to segment content, etc. I could write long posts on each of the issues mentioned in the previous sentence, but the point I am trying to make is that there is more to design than just what looks pretty. I have seen several good graphic designers struggle with designing for the web. The problem is there are designers out there who were trained and practiced in graphic design before the Internet really took hold. They do awesome print material, but struggle with the interactive nature of the web. Having something that works well on the web also requires a certian organic process. If you have a tracking system set up (I highly recommend Google Analytics) then you can test many minor changes. For example, you can answer questions like “How many more people click on my donate button if I change it’s location on the home page?” and “What is the optimal font size for my menu?” My suggestion is to find a designer who has had a lot of online experience and can work with you over the course of the campaign to continue to improve and optimize the user experience. I highly recommend Greg Peterson of L’Atelier Muetpointe located in my home town of Wooster, Ohio.

Secondly, in politics it is always a good idea to develop a “brand.” Companies do it all the time with colors and images. Developing a clean look that conveys your message is critical. Let us take a look at Obama’s logo.

Obama Logo

The colors used are red, white, and blue. These are common colors used in American politics and blue and white are Obama’s colors. The logo is also rounded yet sharp. This conveys a sense of modernity, or as many others saw it a change from the old way of politics to the new. The logo itself looks like a sun raising over farmland, like a new day over the heartland of America. This implies “change” and gives a sense of “hope” for a symbol of America: farming. I would say Obama’s logo is the most brilliant piece of graphic design work I have ever seen. I could go on and one about how brilliant the rest of his graphic design work (from websites to posters) but I think you get the point.

The biggest challenge for a campaign and graphic design is expense. I am not going to lie, good graphic design is not cheap. Expect to pay hundreds of dollars at minimum just for a good logo. This is a decision that has to be made by you. However, I strongly advise campaigns to seriously consider the benefits. For a small campaign with a well known local candidate graphic design will not be on top of their list. However, good graphic design may make the difference in a tight House race. I am by no means suggesting that simply because your site looks awesome people will vote for you. What I am saying is that good graphic design will help consistences relate to you, understand who you are, and feel at ease using the resources you provide them with online. Those are legitimate reasons that will make you better at your job.

Sign of the Times in Honolulu

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

While not necessarily a demonstration of campaign possibilities, the recent Internet vote in Honolulu does reflect a change in voter attitudes to technology and government. Considered a minor story by most news outlets, Honolulu’s neighborhood council election was determined by a combination of Internet vote and phoning in. It was considered a minor story because there were only 115,000 voters. But, according to Yahoo! News, this marks the first all digital election in the United States.

So, what does this mean for your campaign? After all a vote submitted online counts just as much as one marked on a piece of paper. Ignoring the lessons from this election would be a big mistake. The lessons I am talking about have more to do with voter attitudes and less to do with the actual outcome.

First, in a democracy, elections are sacred. All people receive one vote. No outside circumstance is allowed to disfranchise a citizen. This means you cannot create obstacles to voting based on such things as race, gender, and religion. But it also means you cannot block an individual’s voting rights based on ability, i.e. the method of voting should not excluded any group. Poll taxes and literacy tests were attempts at disfranchising targeted groups which often did not meet required
thresholds of a certain ability. Ten years ago, one could make the argument that an all digital vote was also excluding those that either did not have access to a computer or were not comfortable using one. Honolulu’s election has marked a turning point. Most people own a computer and they are also comfortable using it. Even if you do not own a computer, going to the local library to vote on a computer is just as difficult as going to the local library to vote on a piece of paper. To be honest, I believe that using the Internet as the method to vote is the ultimate expression of usability. Computer knowledge is no longer a barrier in our society, but on the list of standard competencies and expectations. In other words, your Internet resources will have the same potential reach as the election itself.

A second point, perhaps not as significant as the first but nevertheless important, is that of security. We are a society that values privacy. Along with our personal data, we have the right to a secret ballot. Individuals’ voting records cannot and will no be kept in elections. On a related note, during an election, the voter must confirm their identity. Nonexistent or deceased people cannot vote. This has been a concern about the Internet for some time: how to do we confirm you are who you say you are and then how do we protect your data? Honolulu has shown us that society is beginning to get over that fear and that we now the technology to do both. The firm that put together the system, Everyone Counts, has pointed out that their system is more secure than Internet banking. This is a comfort everyone can relate to.

The final point is efficiency. This is a story that any organization can appreciate. By voting online, the city saved about $100,000. Looking at preliminary estimates, this would mean the city saved about 56% on total election costs. Just because you are taking a totally new and different approach to campaigning by moving to the Internet does not mean it will be expensive, it may even be more cost effective. I cannot say it will always be cheaper but it is worth looking into.

The next post will be June 9th.

References:

Yahoo! News Article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090523/ap_on_re_us/us_web_voting_1