Archive for the ‘Kasich’ Category

Forms and Usability

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Forms are something that should be on every campaign website no matter how big or small the campaign is. These forms might be to collect contact information, request volunteers, or sign up for events. In any case, the first question always asked when drafting a form is “What information do we need to collect?”

The first reaction to that question is always something like “We need x, and y, and z would be nice…oh, and we can’t forget etc, etc” From a campaign stand point, the more information is the better. The more information you have the better you can mine the data for information about your supporters and the more ways you will have to contact your constituents. Before you go creating a hundred form fields…stop. Think about the form from a user perspective. As a user, do you want to answer a hundred questions? Do you want to have to go through pages and pages of text boxes without knowing when it ends? Most likely the answer is going to be “No.” Your die hard fans may spend the time, but they are going to turn up to vote for you on election day no matter what. The simpler your form is, the more likely visitors will actually fill out the form.

A second issue is with trust. In other words, what information does the visitor trust giving over to your website. There are multiple concerns here such as who sees the data? Where is the data stored? How is the data used? And, is the data secure? You will never be able to answer these questions in a way that will satisfy your visitors. The best solution is to only ask for information that people do not mind having floating around in a server.

One thing I notice a lot of forms do not have is form validation. This is to validate the information itself. For example, an email should have an “@” symbol followed by some sort of domain such as “gmail.com”. If you caught a possible typo in the email, how are you going to get it corrected…by emailing them? Also, you should give them an error message telling them specifically what field is broken. If they put letters in the phone field, say “Invalid characters for phone. Please only enter numbers.” It will also deter bots and people who want to fill your form out with junk. It is worth while to collect only the good data.

Finally, consider layout. I could go on and on about layout, but all I am going to say make it easy to navigate and fill out. Your form should be all on one page and form fields should be obvious. Layout also includes the means of navigating to the form. It should be very obvious how to get to the form and what it is. For example, if I want to volunteer, I do not want to spend a bunch of time searching for that form.

Everyone does forms slightly different. The important thing is to make it usable. There is a balance between simplicity and getting the information you want. You don’t want to ask a million questions, but one question is probably not helpful. A good example of a simple and usable form is Kasich’s Sign Up form. It is short and easy to understand. Better yet, he has a short little video at the top that you can play. Bonus: videos are more engaging and easier to watch than reading a bunch of text.

The next post will be July 5th.

The “Anti-Candidate” Site

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

It is common for political candidates to have a website that advertises the positive aspects of their own candidacy.  However, in some cases a site is created to communicating the negative aspects of a politician.  This is what I mean when I refer to an “anti-candidate” site.

The two that I have had the most interaction with recently revolve around the Ohio gubernatorial race.  The Ohio primary was earlier last week, but both the incumbent Democrat, Gov. Ted Strickland, and the Republican, John Kasich, were unopposed.  Now that the primary has passed, the campaign has begun to heat up.  There is an anti-candidate site for both candidates.  Http://www.TurnAroundTed.com is the anti-Strickland site while http://www.KasichFacts.com is the anti-Kasich.  The disclaimers for both sites claim the respective parties as the owners of the sites, not a specific candidate.  In any case, the approaches taken are different.

To start, I believe TurnAroundTed.com is a better site.  This is more than a political bias.  TurnAroundTed.com clearly has had more work put into it.  This site is rich in content that is updated relatively often.  There are links to articles and statements both independent and created by TurnAroundTed.com.  Just recently they added an interactive map of Ohio where visitors can click on their county to see how their county’s economy has changed since Gov. Strickland first announced he was going to run five years ago.  Please check it out at http://www.turnaroundted.com/map.  All the data there is clearly cited with links.  Even more importantly, there is a place to sign up to volunteer.  Once visitors are convinced that their governor needs to be changed, they can take action.  TurnAroundTed.com is rich in content, personable, and interactive.

KasichFacts.com has none of TurnAroundTed.com’s advantages.  There is very little content and the design looks thrown together.  They have not even bothered to create a favicon (thats the little icon that typically shows up with the site name in the bookmark list.  This blogs is a red “R”).  The one similar feature is that on one page called “Cuts” you can type in your zip code and see how much funding Kasich supposedly wants to cut from services such as schools and fire departments.  The citation is simply “Legislative Service Commission” and a few dates.  There is not even a link for these citations (this is a common theme throughout the site).

What KasichFacts.com has going for it is advertising.  I see Twitter posts that reference KasichFacts.com far more often than TurnAroundTed.com.  Many of these quotes originate from the sites themselves with a “Share This” button which tend to be more common on KasichFacts.com.  Secondly, I see paid ads on Google for KasichFacts.com quite frequently.  This ad recently showed up on my GMail page:

Google, like Bing, Yahoo!, etc, tries to match ads to the context.  The text and keywords set by the ad’s owners is the basis for Google.  The reason I see ads like this is because I have been getting a lot of mail from the Kasich campaign.  This leads me to believe that KasichFacts.com is purposefully targeting Kasich supporters.  A quick Google search for the term “Kasich” yields similar results.  The number two result in my list is KasichFacts.com.  However, their trick is to title their page as “News Alert: John Kasich” which to the casual user will seem like a legitimate neutral site about Kasich.  On a related note, the only ad I see on the left site (where Google typically puts standard ads) is an ad for Strickland’s main site.  A search for “Strickland” will give you pro-Strickland results and of course KasichFacts.com.  In other words, search Kasich and you will get anti-Kasich and pro-Strickland sites.  Search Strickland and you get similar results, anti-Kasich and pro-Strickland sites.

At the end of the day, even though TurnAroundTed.com is a better, more informed site, KasichFacts.com will win because its marketing efforts are currently out maneuvering not only TurnAroundTed.com but Kasich’s campaign in general.  Both sites have strengths and weaknesses, however the strengths are not mutually exclusive.  I hope TurnAroundTed.com can get its marketing efforts ramped up to compete with KasichFacts.com.

The next post will be on May 25th

Monitor Multiple Twitter Feeds

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

One of my many responsibilities is the eCampaign Co-Chair for Kasich for Ohio Governor in Butler County. My primary focus is on social media for the county. Each county has a different Tweeter account. The one I manage in Butler County is @ButlerForKasich. I have been experimenting with Twitter and have discovered a lot of useful information, not only for Kasich in Butler County but also for Ohio in general. This was done by using a tool I have mentioned before: TweetDeck.

I have many, many feeds that I have created and follow in TweetDeck. TweetDeck allows you to define feeds using various parameters. For example, you could set the parameter to a group of users or anyone who uses certain keywords. The really nice thing is you can set up multiple columns in the TweetDeck application so you can see these feeds simultaneously. In @ButlerForKasich’s case, I have columns for all followers, mentions (Tweets with a specific users name), and a column each for keywords “kasich” and “strickland” (the incumbent Democrat is Gov. Ted Strickland).

This set up has allowed me to track everything that is going on with the governors race in Butler County and Ohio. We have started building up followers since I can quickly and effectively engage local Twitters. And, interestingly enough, I have discovered the Strickland campaign Butler County, specifically @ButlerForKasich. My account is the only county account that gets challenged by Strickland’s anti-Kasich campaign “Kasich Facts.” This typically involves inaccurate information but on one interesting occasion @KasichFacts tried to trick people into thinking we supported the anti-Kasich campaign. Take a look at these two Tweets:

As you can see, my Tweet was promoting Kasich’s statewide website, www.KasichForOhio.com. However, @KasichFacts took that Tweet and substituted in the anti-Kasich site, www.KasichFacts.com, and made it look like a re-tweet. They technically did not misquote us because they did not use the “RT” prefix to signify a re-tweet. I find these types of tricks underhanded, but at least the Strickland campaign’s insecurity towards the @ButlerForKasich account shows that I am doing my job.

The moral of the story in today’s post is you need to monitor multiple Twitter feeds. It will help you find opportunities and identify threats. There is a wealth of information out there, don’t pass it up!

The next post will be May 11th.